<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Posts on c o m p a r t m e n t a l i z a t i o n</title><link>https://rodneybarlow.com/posts/index.html</link><description>Recent content in Posts on c o m p a r t m e n t a l i z a t i o n</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 00:00:00 -0700</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://rodneybarlow.com/posts/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Off Switch</title><link>https://rodneybarlow.com/posts/off-switch.html</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate><guid>https://rodneybarlow.com/posts/off-switch.html</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;You&amp;rsquo;re reading a post, an email, a doc — and then you hit it:&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;pre tabindex="0"&gt;&lt;code&gt;&amp;#34;It&amp;#39;s not just a tool. It&amp;#39;s a paradigm shift.&amp;#34;&#10;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;p&gt;Your brain switches off. You felt it. Something about that sentence registered something as all-too-familiar. You stopped internalizing the idea and instead focused myopically on the construction. The writer lost you because you hit the intellectual off switch.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;That construction has a name: negative parallelism. &amp;ldquo;Not X, but Y.&amp;rdquo; &amp;ldquo;Less about A, more about B.&amp;rdquo; &amp;ldquo;It isn&amp;rsquo;t the thing — it&amp;rsquo;s the other thing.&amp;rdquo; It shows up in a hundred variations, and every one of them triggers the same AI slop mental block: I want to connect with this idea but it smells like AI&amp;hellip; and it should be simpler.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Unfolding... Urgently</title><link>https://rodneybarlow.com/posts/unfolding-urgently.html</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2025 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate><guid>https://rodneybarlow.com/posts/unfolding-urgently.html</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;According to a recent Stack Overflow &lt;a href="https://survey.stackoverflow.co/2025/ai#3-ai-agents"&gt;report&lt;/a&gt;, a significant percentage of engineers have not adopted AI coding tools. Barely 50% riding faster horses, less than 20% riding in Waymos. Forget about agentic &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;building&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;, they haven&amp;rsquo;t even adopted AI &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;coding&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;The unfolding of capabilities has been incredible. We&amp;rsquo;ve evolved from copy paste (ChatGPT) to writing each line of code faster (GitHub Copilot) to agentic coding (Cursor) to agentic building (Claude Code). However, there&amp;rsquo;s a dichotomy at play throughout the unfolding of agentic building — the pace has been both incredibly fast and yet gradual. So slow in fact, that for an engineer not to have adopted agentic building practices borders on negligence.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>